The Minutes reveal the actions and decisions of the Board and who voted for or against Motions. The Minutes are the way for the Public to know what is going on.
The Minutes have been attached to the Agenda so that, with a click, one can read them. Except not this week.
The last meeting (August 13) was the one in which there was a Motion to approve the Superintendent's evaluation and his 12.3% raise. On that night two trustees voted against the Motion to Approve. The vote was 5-2.
The reasons given by both were the Super-Majority requirement to send the superintendent packing, if that's what the board decided to do. This would mean that five of the seven-member board would have to agree. There was no mention of what is probably a very healthy early-termination penalty that the District would have to cough it, if it wanted to replace the superintendent.
Somebody on the Board negotiated that with the superintendent, and so that language showed up in his contract. He certainly would have wanted it, but why would the board roll over. The board apparently wasn't allowed to nitpick the proposed contract renewal.
A third person, trustee-elect Holmes, didn't like the Super-Majority provision, but she didn't back it up with a No vote.
One trustee had a second reason for voting No. That second reason was the size of the superintendent's raise - 12.3%. She was right! And that was in addition to the STEP increase.
The Voice of Blythewood & Fairfield County newspaper reported on August 22 the following:
"On July 1, Davis’ salary rose from $191,904 to $197,661 after he accepted a STEP increase coupled with a 1 percent raise the district gave administrators.
"Six weeks later, the Richland Two Board of trustees tacked on another 12.3 percent, elevating the superintendent’s base pay to $221,973, fifth highest in the state, according to public records."
The increase from $191,094 to $197,661 is 3%. The superintendent also receives $18,000/year as a automobile allowance.So, where are the Minutes for the August 13th meeting. I guess the public won't get a chance to read them before the August 27th meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment