You can read the entire list on the district's website. Need the instructions to find that Policy? Look back on this blog or email me.
Level II is Disruptive Conduct. That's more serious than the Behavioral Misconduct of Level I. See the recent article here about Level I, just a few days ago.
According to the Board, Level II offenses have "... consequences of which tend to endanger the health or safety of themselves of others..."
Look at the list. "Tend to"???
Review the list of Level I offenses. A four-time repeat offender of Level I behavioral conduct "may" have his misconduct re-classified as Level II Disruptive Conduct. Not "will" or "shall"; the word used is "may". Lots of discretion there.
This carries Richland 2 right into the problem at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida that resulted in 17 dead and 17 injured on February 14, 2018. When students get away with bad behavior, it can get worse.
Level II misconduct may justify both "administrative consequences and court proceedings".
Notice how the word "consequences" has crept into use over the years. Kids are not penalized or punished these days; now they suffer "consequences". (How many times did I hear in the business world - we don't have "problems" here; we have "opportunities". I was always popular, when I said, "No, we have problems.")
Look at some (not all) of the examples of Level II misconduct:
- use of an intoxicant (on school grounds)
- fighting
- harassment
- stealing
- threats against others
- abusive language to staff
- simple assault
- unlawful assembly
- use of forged notes or excused
People are screaming about the school-to-prison pipeline. Well, maybe if kids learned to obey laws and not commit crimes, they wouldn't worry about being arrested and going to prison.
When crimes are minimized and dealt with an offenses, rather than as criminal acts, my guess is that many kids do not learn.
Level II offenses are dealt with by an administrator. He (or she) calls Mommy for a conference.
The administrator "may" refer to the SRO "only when the conduct rises to the level of criminality or the conduct presents an immediate safety risk." Look at the list again. See all those criminal acts? Again, "may" is used. So there could be internal district pressure to keep down the number of referrals to law enforcement.
Next: Level III - Criminal Conduct
No comments:
Post a Comment