The State newspaper reports on the April 28, 2022 Special-Called Board Meeting. At 3:22PM today reporter Bristow Marchant published an article below this headline: "Police report says one Richland 2 school board member threatened to ‘beat’ another"
Read the article at: https://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article261126992.html#storylink=cpy"
The article opens with "The chairwoman of the Richland 2 school board filed a police report on another board member who threatened during a heated exchange at the last board meeting to beat one of her colleagues".
My first question is, why would Teresa Holmes file a police report, if she is not involved? Was she the victim? That's not what the first sentence says. The first sentence intimates that two other board members were involved.
The reporter wrote that Holmes declined to comment to The State.
Executive Sessions are supposed to be confidential. So why did Holmes make the complaint? Seems to me that if a person was threatened, that person needs to make the complaint. Not Holmes.
Just a couple of days ago I was reminded of Holmes' "report" against me for harassing her in 2019. I'm still laughing over that one.
Holmes had a knee-jerk reaction to the emails I was sending to the board about McKie and her being illegitimate members of the board. After one of the emails, she hot-footed it down to RCSD in the middle of her workday in Blythewood and made a "report". The deputy's statement of what Holmes said was full of lies, and the "report" went nowhere. I should have had her charged with Filing a False Police Report. You can read one of the stories I wrote about that on March 21, 2019 right here: https://richland2sd.blogspot.com/2019/03/citizen-accused-by-r2-board-member.html
The article does not mention that any charges were filed, and there is no record of charges in the public record of the Fifth Judicial Circuit Public Index, as of right now.
The article mentioned that a board member recorded ("filmed") the exchange. Wouldn't that be an improper use of cell phone on school property, according to Board Policy?
The reporter's final sentence in today's article is erroneous. He wrote, "Two people were removed from the meeting by law enforcement and formally warned not to return to the property."
After the meltdown by Pamela Davis at the January 25th board meeting, I was not removed from the meeting by law enforcement.
No comments:
Post a Comment