This is NOT correct.
Three board members can control the board, and they should. Judiciously, of course.
Remember when three trustees walked out because of the short notice they were given to consider the superintendent's proposed contract renewal? That worked!
They should have used that again when they were asked to vote on The Wyche Law Firm on such short notice. The superintendent and the chair apparently withheld information about Wyche from at least three of the trustees until the executive committee met. Did Manning, McKie and Caution-Parker get the information days earlier? Did they even care if they didn't?
Agostini, Scott and McFadden could have walked out, eliminating a quorum and halting the meeting.
And last Tuesday night, when the same three wanted more time to consider the $300,000,000+ budget for 2022-2023?
Walk-out time.
The same when they raised a Point-of-Order. When the Chair failed to recognize the call for a Point-of-Order, the trustee needs to say it again and more loudly. If still not recognized, then stand up and say it loudly. And if that doesn't work, three trustees can walk out.
They could remain in the hall for five minutes, hoping the Chair would decide to comply with Robert's Rules of Order. If not, the meeting is over for that evening.
I wrote to them earlier in the year and suggested they consider that philosophy. I told them it's like training a new puppy.
When you train a puppy, it only takes a few times of discipline.
If the chair refused reasonable requests and positions, walk out.
I figured it might have taken a little longer with the Chair, but it would have worked. The bullying would have stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment