How many months ago (years?) did I urge the District to do that? Two years? Three?
Having all official emails on the District's server is essential under public records laws. As I wrote then, one day in the future that trustee (or trustees, as the case was, because Teresa Holmes also used a personal gmail address) would no longer be in office, whether by death, resignation, completion of term, failure to be re-elected, retirement, etc.
And then, very recently, the State Inspector General's Report was released, and bingo! Monica now has a District email address.
Why didn't the District just use common sense when the suggestion was made way back then?
The District created an official email address for Teresa Holmes earlier this year, but it allowed her to continue to use her gmail address and published it on the District's website. I guess the District just couldn't figure out how to say NO to Teresa. Was the "equity" at work? Or "privilege"?
That personal email address has now been removed from the Board Member webpage.
Maybe Richland 2 will create a Wall for me at R2i2 and recognize me for the highest number of good suggestions submitted - and never considered or implemented.
No comments:
Post a Comment