In a number of Regular Meetings of the school board, when the board returns from Executive Session, the Chair describes a vote in Executive Session to end it and return to open session.
NO votes are allowed in Executive Session, even if later disclosed. A vote to end Executive Session is not allowed and is not needed; they just stop talking and move back to the public setting and then they re-convene. They "re-convene" because they had to first convene in open session before they could go into Executive Session.
If any vote at the beginning of the re-convened session should be taken, it would be to re-convene. There is no need to describe returning from Executive Session or what transpired there, since they are precluded from talking about what happened in Executive Session.
Later in the Regular Meeting is an agenda item for voting on any matters from the Executive Session that need action.
This Board should hire the Robert's Rules of Order expert, Helen McFadden. She attended a board meeting several months ago, and interest was expressed by at least one board member that she be invited back.
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Livestream Training Needed for Board
The Richland 2 School Board needs training in professional conduct at Livestream Board Meetings.
What's wrong?
One board member's little yapping dog barks.
Keep your hands out of your hair during meetings.
Position your camera so that it faces you directly at eye-level.
Don't fidget.
Keep your hands off the camera.
Present slides from a computer so that the wording can be read.
Train board members on background and lighting.
Board members dressed professionally in business attire for in-person board meetings. Is there any reason that has changed?
What's wrong?
One board member's little yapping dog barks.
Keep your hands out of your hair during meetings.
Position your camera so that it faces you directly at eye-level.
Don't fidget.
Keep your hands off the camera.
Present slides from a computer so that the wording can be read.
Train board members on background and lighting.
Board members dressed professionally in business attire for in-person board meetings. Is there any reason that has changed?
2020-2021 Budget Meeting
The Richland 2 School Board held a 20-minute special-called meeting today to discuss the 2020-2021 budget. The meeting was live-streamed.
It was shocking to see that there were only 11-13 people attending this meeting. The counter in the upper left never exceeded 13. Did that include seven on the board, plus Supt. Davis, Libby Roof, Harry Miley and the woman from his department, to whom Dr. Miley gave credit for the report? And me? And one more?
Or was the number (13) those who were attending (excluding the board and staff) and viewing the livestream meeting?
Where were all the teachers who ought to be concerned about whether they are going to get paid or have jobs?
Maybe they were still teaching at 5:00PM. Reports to me indicate that they are having very long days.
Where were the parents and taxpayers who ought to be wondering whether their taxes will be going up?
The District should email survey (SurveyMonkey.com?) after meetings and ask questions, such as:
Did you know about the meeting?
Did you attend the meeting?
Did you plan to attend the meeting but missed it?
Will you watch the replay on YouTube or Livestream?
What would help you attend future board meetings?
- Email reminder?
- RoboCall?
Should the District create a Public Portal like the City of Columbia?
Should the rescind the suspension of Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings?
On a scale of 1-5 (5 being High), how important do you feel your voice is to the School Board?
Electronic surveys are dirt-cheap. But does the Board really want to know what parents, taxpayers and voters think?
It was shocking to see that there were only 11-13 people attending this meeting. The counter in the upper left never exceeded 13. Did that include seven on the board, plus Supt. Davis, Libby Roof, Harry Miley and the woman from his department, to whom Dr. Miley gave credit for the report? And me? And one more?
Or was the number (13) those who were attending (excluding the board and staff) and viewing the livestream meeting?
Where were all the teachers who ought to be concerned about whether they are going to get paid or have jobs?
Maybe they were still teaching at 5:00PM. Reports to me indicate that they are having very long days.
Where were the parents and taxpayers who ought to be wondering whether their taxes will be going up?
The District should email survey (SurveyMonkey.com?) after meetings and ask questions, such as:
Did you know about the meeting?
Did you attend the meeting?
Did you plan to attend the meeting but missed it?
Will you watch the replay on YouTube or Livestream?
What would help you attend future board meetings?
- Email reminder?
- RoboCall?
Should the District create a Public Portal like the City of Columbia?
Should the rescind the suspension of Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings?
On a scale of 1-5 (5 being High), how important do you feel your voice is to the School Board?
Electronic surveys are dirt-cheap. But does the Board really want to know what parents, taxpayers and voters think?
Monday, May 18, 2020
Agenda updated for 5/19/20 Special-Called Board Meeting
The agenda for the May 19, 2020 Special-Called Meeting has been updated to include a link to the 2020-2021 Budget. The title slide for the attachment is Budget Workshop.
Tomorrow's meeting starts at 5:00PM. View the meeting here: http://www.richland2.org/livestream
You will NOT have any opportunity to speak or participate!
A Budget Workshop has traditionally been the opportunity for the public to examine and comment on the budget for the coming school year.
Last week the Board suspended Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings. It didn't just suspend it temporarily, as Amelia McKie claimed so emphatically. Her wording was false and deceiving, and her statement should have been corrected by the Board Secretary or the Board Chair before the vote was taken.
There was nothing in the Motion about a "temporary" suspension. The Board suspended the public's opportunity to address the board at meetings. In other words, squelched, squashed, silenced. The board should be embarrassed about its vote. The vote was 6-0.
Only Trustee Lindsay Agostini voted NO on the Motion to suspend BEDH.
If you care to look at the proposed budget, it's here. Warning: what is "here" is the link posted by the District at this moment (5/19;/20 10:20AM). It can be changed at any time before today at 5:00PM.
If you have a comment on the budget, email your comments to board members, whose email addresses are here. Or phone them.
Sunday, May 17, 2020
Letter to the Editor, The Voice
The following Letter to the Editor has been sent to The Voice of Blythewood & Fairfield County. Be sure to read The Voice often. Remember, it is the paper that discovered that Amelia McKie and Teresa Holmes had failed to file the Statements of Economic Interest Reports with the S.C. Ethics Commission before taking the oath of office. It also reported extensively of McKie's $51,750 debt to the S.C. Ethics Commission for four years' worth of failure regarding required reporting.
The Richland 2 School Board stuck it to the voters, taxpayers, parents, staff and students on May 12, when it voted to suspend Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings. Not suspend it temporarily, as Amelia McKie explained. There was no "temporarily" about it. They voted 6-1 to suspend it. That means it is no longer in effect.
The Richland 2 School Board stuck it to the voters, taxpayers, parents, staff and students on May 12, when it voted to suspend Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings. Not suspend it temporarily, as Amelia McKie explained. There was no "temporarily" about it. They voted 6-1 to suspend it. That means it is no longer in effect.
Is the suspension of BEDH a First Amendment violation? An infringement on free speech? After all, the school board is a public body. Meetings are (supposed to be) open. Trustee Agostini explained the "meeting portal" (https://columbiacitysc.iqm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx) that the City of Columbia has opened.
BEDH allowed the public to speak at board meetings. No more. BEDH allowed the public to suggest items for board consideration. No more. The Richland 2 Board suspended BEDH at the suggestion and encouragement of the S.C. School Boards Assn. Who runs the Richland 2 District? The SCSBA? No, the elected school board does. At least, it ought to.
When "temporary" was not part of the Motion, why would McKie say the suspension is temporary? Was that an attempt to mislead the public? Why didn't the Chairman clarify before the vote that the suspension would NOT be temporary?
Trustee Elkins-Johnson wanted the suspension only through the end of the summer, but she gave up easily when she wasn't supported. Trustee Lindsay Agostini was the only school member to vote NO. Thank you, Lindsay, for sticking up for the voters and taxpayers.
Gus Philpott
Saturday, May 16, 2020
Board Policy BEDH - 3/31/20 Action. 5/12/20 Action
In its Regular Meeting on March 31, 2020 your Richland 2 School Board suspended Board Policy BEDH - Public Participation at Meetings. Its action was to suspend this policy temporarily until April 30, 2020.
You'd think by now that suspension of BEDH would have been notated somewhere on the District's website, so that the public would be duly and legally informed of this action. A good place to notate that would be right in the Policy itself.
You might want to read Board Policy BEDH. It describes the conditions of speaking publicly at Board meetings and also described how you, the public, can initiate items for a future Board agenda. Go to the District's website; read it. When you do, it will look like that policy is in effect today. It is not.
Those privileges vanished, temporarily, on March 31, 2020. But only until April 30, 2020.
Then, on May 12, 2020, with BEDH out from under its temporary suspension, the Board acted on BEDH again. This time the Board suspended BEDH.
Not temporarily, as Amelia McKie said at the meeting.
Not until the end of summer, as Monica Elkins-Johnson wanted.
Not until the end of the state of emergency, ambiguous as that is.
Not until the end of the pandemic.
The Board SUSPENDED Policy BEDH. Period. As in, a done deal. As in, permanently.
This is your School Board - working hard on your behalf - muzzling you, the public.
If you disagree, contact the Board by phone and in writing. And post your objection here. Write to The State newspaper; call your TV stations; write to The Voice of Blythewood & Fairfield County.
Sending it to the board (only) means that your request will disappear into the Black Hole.
You'd think by now that suspension of BEDH would have been notated somewhere on the District's website, so that the public would be duly and legally informed of this action. A good place to notate that would be right in the Policy itself.
You might want to read Board Policy BEDH. It describes the conditions of speaking publicly at Board meetings and also described how you, the public, can initiate items for a future Board agenda. Go to the District's website; read it. When you do, it will look like that policy is in effect today. It is not.
Those privileges vanished, temporarily, on March 31, 2020. But only until April 30, 2020.
Then, on May 12, 2020, with BEDH out from under its temporary suspension, the Board acted on BEDH again. This time the Board suspended BEDH.
Not temporarily, as Amelia McKie said at the meeting.
Not until the end of summer, as Monica Elkins-Johnson wanted.
Not until the end of the state of emergency, ambiguous as that is.
Not until the end of the pandemic.
The Board SUSPENDED Policy BEDH. Period. As in, a done deal. As in, permanently.
This is your School Board - working hard on your behalf - muzzling you, the public.
If you disagree, contact the Board by phone and in writing. And post your objection here. Write to The State newspaper; call your TV stations; write to The Voice of Blythewood & Fairfield County.
Sending it to the board (only) means that your request will disappear into the Black Hole.
Friday, May 15, 2020
Special-Called Meeting - Tues., May 19. 5:00PM, Zoom?
The District has announced a Special-Called Board Meeting for Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 5:00P.M.
The purpose of the meeting is FY 20-21 General Fund Budget Update.
Budget Updates have traditionally been preceded by a period of public participation. The Board nixed the entire public participation aspect of board meetings earlier this week. And the Agenda for the meeting provides no means for the public to provide input about the budget for the next school year.
At Tuesday's Board meeting this week Trustee Lindsay Agostini mentioned that the City of Columbia City Council provides a public access portal. Why can't Richland 2 do the same?
READ HERE how the City of Columbia accommodates the public. "You may also register at this site to post comments about items on the agenda. Comments posted about specific agenda items prior to 2:00 p.m. will be read during the Public Comment segment of the meeting."
WHAT? They will read comments from the public AT the public meeting? Really?
If the Richland 2 School Board was really interested in the opinion of members of the public, it would do this. But it doesn't. Trustee Agostini would favor this, I'll bet. So would Trustee Elkins-Johnson. The rest of them? Probably not.
According to the Agenda, the meeting will be held "Electronically via Zoom".
If you were lucky enough to see the Press Release by the District, you would know that the meeting will not be on Zoom. It will be broadcast on www.richland2.org/livestream
State law requires the District to publish the location of the meeting. If it is to be broadcast only on the internet, then the URL for the meeting should be shown on the agenda.
I can't figure out what part of that is so difficult for someone at Richland 2 to understand. I mean, these are people with degree and certificates and PhD's and (you name it). Does no one think to ask, "How will the public find this meeting?"
As of right now (5/15/20, 6:35PM, there is no message on the District's homepage that provides the location of the meeting. Maybe that will change on Monday. Maybe not. Anyone looking at the Agenda, where the location is supposed to be shown, will be out-of-luck.
The purpose of the meeting is FY 20-21 General Fund Budget Update.
Budget Updates have traditionally been preceded by a period of public participation. The Board nixed the entire public participation aspect of board meetings earlier this week. And the Agenda for the meeting provides no means for the public to provide input about the budget for the next school year.
At Tuesday's Board meeting this week Trustee Lindsay Agostini mentioned that the City of Columbia City Council provides a public access portal. Why can't Richland 2 do the same?
READ HERE how the City of Columbia accommodates the public. "You may also register at this site to post comments about items on the agenda. Comments posted about specific agenda items prior to 2:00 p.m. will be read during the Public Comment segment of the meeting."
WHAT? They will read comments from the public AT the public meeting? Really?
If the Richland 2 School Board was really interested in the opinion of members of the public, it would do this. But it doesn't. Trustee Agostini would favor this, I'll bet. So would Trustee Elkins-Johnson. The rest of them? Probably not.
According to the Agenda, the meeting will be held "Electronically via Zoom".
If you were lucky enough to see the Press Release by the District, you would know that the meeting will not be on Zoom. It will be broadcast on www.richland2.org/livestream
State law requires the District to publish the location of the meeting. If it is to be broadcast only on the internet, then the URL for the meeting should be shown on the agenda.
I can't figure out what part of that is so difficult for someone at Richland 2 to understand. I mean, these are people with degree and certificates and PhD's and (you name it). Does no one think to ask, "How will the public find this meeting?"
As of right now (5/15/20, 6:35PM, there is no message on the District's homepage that provides the location of the meeting. Maybe that will change on Monday. Maybe not. Anyone looking at the Agenda, where the location is supposed to be shown, will be out-of-luck.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)