Thursday, February 3, 2022

Incompetence? Intention? Insult?

Which is it?

Richland 2 school district has still failed to provide anything in writing to me about Marq Claxton's verbal trespass warning on Tuesday, January 25.

Even a student who is disciplined in Richland 2 and gets kicked out of school gets something in writing, explaining his rights. You know, something like "You have the right to appeal this suspension from school."

Of course, a lot of difference it makes to the suspended student, who is kicked out of school for 5-10 days and then gets an appeal hearing, after he has unwillingly endured his suspension. And if the appeal is successful and the suspension is reversed? 

Too bad! He already missed the 5-10 days of school and suffered the embarrassment and humiliation of the suspension.

Is the rule at Richland 2 "Guilty Until Proven Innocent"?

What is the real reason that Richland 2 has not promptly delivered any written Trespass Notice?

Is it part of a nefarious plan of retaliation and retribution for speaking out about what is so wrong with how board meetings are being conducted?

Is it part of a design, hoping that I'll feel intimidated, afraid, targeted? 

Sorry, Richland 2. It's not working.

No comments:

Post a Comment