I wondered how they were going to fix the error. They fixed it by just changing that wording of the Motion, after it was voted on.
Here is the Motion. Read the last sentence:
Now read the Motion as printed in the Minutes:
"Mr. Chair after reviewing Dr. Davis's report on the district's progress, and considering the Board members comments regarding Dr. Davis's performance I move that we conclude as a Board that Dr. Davis receive an overall meets expectation evaluation for the 2021-2022 school year. I further move that as a result of Dr. Davis' overall meets expectation evaluation that Dr. Davis' employment contract with the District be extended one year through June 30, 2026."
What's missing? Right! The final sentence.
It's easy to understand how the error happened. If Holmes had simply made the motion, without all the pomp and circumstance and fluff, it would have read: "I move that Supt. Davis be given a Meets Expectation evaluation and that his contract be extended one year." That's all she needed to say.
Instead, she overwhelmed the recording secretary with unnecessary language. Worse then, Holmes, Manning, McKie, and Caution-Parker did not read the Motion to ascertain that it was correct.
Hence, the majority of the board voted to conclude Dr. Davis' employment contract.
And they can't fix that by merely changing the words in the Minutes. No lawyer will tell them that is okay!
No comments:
Post a Comment